<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LPGA: Ladies PolyGlot Association?</title>
	<link>http://cephyn.com/2008/08/27/lpga-ladies-polyglot-association/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:04:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: LPGA Comes to its Senses &#124; cephyn</title>
		<link>http://cephyn.com/2008/08/27/lpga-ladies-polyglot-association/#comment-3143</link>
		<author>LPGA Comes to its Senses &#124; cephyn</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 19:42:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://cephyn.com/2008/08/27/lpga-ladies-polyglot-association/#comment-3143</guid>
		<description>[...] Earlier, I talked about the LPGA policy to suspend players that could not pass an English proficiency exam. Well, it took them about a week, but the LPGA has decided to rethink the policy. I should hope so. They buckled under both criticism from media and players, but it seems that what finally did them in was criticism from sponsors. Not a big surprise that they go where the sponsors say, but at least they took the right stand. For example: One of the tour&#8217;s title sponsors, State Farm, already weighed in this week by saying it was &#8220;dumbfounded.&#8221; &#8220;We don&#8217;t understand this and we don&#8217;t know why they have done it,&#8221; State Farm spokesman Kip Diggs told Advertising Age on its Web site. &#8220;And we have strongly encouraged them to take another look at this.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Earlier, I talked about the LPGA policy to suspend players that could not pass an English proficiency exam. Well, it took them about a week, but the LPGA has decided to rethink the policy. I should hope so. They buckled under both criticism from media and players, but it seems that what finally did them in was criticism from sponsors. Not a big surprise that they go where the sponsors say, but at least they took the right stand. For example: One of the tour&#8217;s title sponsors, State Farm, already weighed in this week by saying it was &#8220;dumbfounded.&#8221; &#8220;We don&#8217;t understand this and we don&#8217;t know why they have done it,&#8221; State Farm spokesman Kip Diggs told Advertising Age on its Web site. &#8220;And we have strongly encouraged them to take another look at this.&#8221; [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

